Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The Freedom to Worship

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is also the first section of the Bill of Rights.
It is arguably the most important part of the U.S. Constitution, as it guarantees freedoms
of religion, speech, writing and publishing, peaceful assembly, and the freedom to raise
grievances with the Government. In addition, it requires that a wall of separation be
maintained between church and state. It reads:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people
peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Let's focus on the first 16 word insuring that the people of the United States have a fundamental freedom of religion. A right that can not be compromised by Congress. What does this mean to us? What it means is that as an individual living with the United States we have a right to practice whatever religion we wish or even no religion at all. Whatever our choice, government can not intervene. So why when a private owner of land near Ground Zero wanted to build a mosque did political leaders within our boarders fight against it? Surely someone of power within our government would understand, even if they didn't like it, that the individual or company that wanted to build a mosque could do so without public ridicule. Former Governor of Alaska and vice presidential candidate, Sarah Palin called the idea “a stab in the heart of the families of the innocent victims of those horrific attacks.” New York Representative, Republican Peter King, who says, "While the Muslim community has the right to build the mosque, they are abusing that right by needlessly offending so many people who have suffered so much." In other words because it makes someone feel bad, it shouldn't be allowed.

There's no doubt about it, the First Amendment practically guarantees that, at some point,
everybody is going to be offended. But we don't use that as our
standard for determining who gets to exercise their rights. The Constitution does not care if I'm offended or you're offended. There are some things that are more important than that. Or would you rather live without the protections afforded by the First Amendment?
The idea of a mosque built on, around, or even near Ground Zero sparked a nationwide debate on the subject. The opposing side took and emotional stand against the project because of the pain it may cause the family members of victims of the attacks. There were others that began to speak out saying that it was wrong because the Muslims caused the attacks. The supporting side stood by the words of the Constitution for this country. This argument is one that is more concrete and follows the laws of this country.

There is no argument that the attacks of September 11, 2009 were both senseless and
devastating both to our country and to the families who lost loved ones. It is a moment
in our nation’s history that will never be forgotten or disrespected by the people of our
country. However, the losses of life, pain, or anger are no excuse to blatantly defy the
Constitution of our nation. It was not the Muslim community that caused those attacks it
was radicals of the Muslim community.  The oppositions argument of pain is very weak though a online poll still shows that over 70% of Americans oppose the building of the mosque.

In a quote from New York congressman Jerrold Nadler (D), he  explains thoroughly and simply the reasons for the opposition of the argument are wrong and why.  
  “What they are saying essentially is how can you put a mosque there when, after all, Muslims attacked us on 9/11, and this is ripping open a wound? Well, the fallacy is that Al Qaida attacked us. Islam did not attack us. Islam, like Christianity, like Judaism, like other religions, has many different people, some of whom regard other adherents of the religion as heretics of one sort or another.   It is only insensitive if you regard Islam as the culprit, as opposed to Al Qaida as the culprit. We were not attacked by all Muslims. And there were Muslims who were killed there, there were Muslims who were killed there. There were Muslims who ran in
as first responders to help. And we cannot take any position like that. …there is a mosque in the Pentagon, which is also hallowed ground. No one objects to that. The people who want to build this facility, which is partially a mosque and partially a community center, have a mosque a few blocks away from there, which no one has objected to.”

No comments:

Post a Comment